user_mobilelogo

Search the Blog

patreon logoLike what you read? Find the posts helpful? Support the blog via Patreon to get even more of the stuff you enjoyed!

Blogging Archaeology Carnival January

Dear Doug, thank you so much for your January question. This was a welcome excuse to go waste a lot of time finally catch up on my blog statistics again. Though I confess that I am a slight bit confused by them…

To keep those of you not checking into Doug’s summary up to date, January’s questions are:

What are your best (or if you want your worst) post(s) and why? Compare and contrast your different bests/worsts.
I leave it up to you to define what best is. We bloggers have all sorts of different stats available to us.

(Doug then gives a list of suggestions on what could be defining best and worst.)

So naturally, the first thing I did was look at stats. As all bloggers, I have the blogger stats available to me, plus I have an extra statcounter installed. Both are somewhat… lacking, to my taste, in giving a good and complete overview – the blogger one tells me that some of my early posts (from back in 2010 and 2009) have never received a single visit, which I find hard to believe. This one here, for example – which is admittedly not one of my most brilliant posts ever. However, at least the most patient husband of them all usually reads my blog every day, so it should have at least one view, right?

According to blogger stats, most of my relatively current posts get hits somewhere between the high twenties and low sixties, with outliers (often linky posts that get handed on by others) that are solidly in the one- to twohundred hit range. This is probably not counting any rss feeds, though I am not sure how many of you get this via feed.

The most viewed post of all time (9485 views) is actually a link post – this one here, linking on to instructions for unwinding a small skein of yarn. Follow-up with 6586 hits is my own post about how to untangle a skein of yarn, which has been popping up as the most viewed one consistently since I wrote it back in November 2009. I still like it, too – it’s long and tries to be a little humorous as well. So that’s probably what I would consider one of my best posts, in terms of effort spent to views gained, and possibly also helpfulness (at least I hope so).

Much lower in the hitcount lists are other posts that were a more than average effort to write, like the Skjoldehamn neck flap one (2775 hits). Pictures from this, however, have been turning up across the ‘net (and not always with acknowledgement).
On a more positive note for me, posts about the Textile Forum (and there’s many of them) are consistently getting higher hit counts than my normal posts, too – and since that conference project is one very close to my heart, this makes me very happy. They are not always what I’d consider a splendid piece of writing, though.

And some of my favourite posts in the blog are the ones about fair prices for crafts – all tagged under “fair prices for crafts campaign“. They did get a good share of love (and hits), ranging somewhere between almost 500 and 1340 hits for the posts in the main series (the one also linked to on the sidebar).

That’s about what I would consider the best posts of my blog. I won’t go into the worst ones, though – with trying hard to post weekdaily all year around, there are bound to be plenty of non-brilliant posts just telling you that I ran out of ideas, or giving a random link and two lines of uninspired writing. I am sorry for those, and I feel a little bad about it every time I post such a one, but really – it can’t be helped, and putting on pressure to be totes brill all the time… just won’t work.

If you will tell me about your favourite post (or your least favourite one!) on this blog in the comments, though, I’d greatly appreciate that!

This entry was posted in Blogging Archaeology Carnival, blogosphere. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Blogging Archaeology Carnival January

  1. The Skjoldehamn neck flap posts were what led me to start following your blog.

    I look at your blog every time it updates, and has for years–so I am also surprised that you have posts for which there are no views.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *